Commission-free trading became widespread only after brokerages found other ways to sustain the business. Understanding these revenue sources — without assuming they are automatically good or bad — is part of a full brokerage evaluation.

Payment for Order Flow

One of the most discussed revenue sources is payment for order flow (PFOF). Instead of routing your order directly to a public exchange, a brokerage may route it to a market maker, which pays the brokerage compensation for that order flow. This practice is legal and disclosed, but it has drawn regulatory scrutiny over whether it could create an incentive that is not always perfectly aligned with securing the best possible execution price for the customer.

PFOF does not automatically mean you receive a worse price. Many brokerages that use it still provide competitive or better-than-quoted execution on average — the way to evaluate this concretely is through a brokerage's published execution quality statistics, not assumptions about the practice alone.

Interest on Uninvested Cash

Brokerages often hold customer cash balances that are not currently invested — money sitting in the account between trades, for example — in interest-bearing arrangements. The brokerage may keep some or all of the interest earned on these balances rather than passing the full amount to the customer. This has become an increasingly significant revenue source, particularly during periods of higher interest rates.

Margin Lending Interest

If a customer borrows against their account through a margin account, the brokerage charges interest on the borrowed amount. This interest is a direct and often substantial revenue source. Importantly, margin interest is only charged on funds actually borrowed — simply having a margin-enabled account without borrowing does not trigger this cost.

Premium Subscriptions and Add-On Services

Many commission-free brokerages offer optional paid tiers, bundling features like advanced charting, in-depth research reports, or extended customer support into a monthly or annual subscription. This is a straightforward, transparent revenue stream that does not depend on trading activity.

A Neutral Comparison

Revenue SourceHow It WorksDirectly Tied to Your Trading?
Payment for order flowCompensation for routing your orderYes, per trade
Cash balance interestInterest earned on your uninvested cashIndirectly, based on balance
Margin lending interestInterest on borrowed fundsOnly if you use margin
Premium subscriptionsOptional paid feature tierNo, opt-in only

How to Evaluate This as an Investor

None of these revenue models are inherently harmful — every brokerage needs a sustainable business model. What matters is transparency: a brokerage should clearly disclose its order routing practices and be willing to share execution quality data. See our guide on order execution quality for how to interpret this data directly, rather than relying on assumptions about a business model.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Assuming "commission-free" means there are no revenue sources tied to your account at all.
  • Avoiding a brokerage based on PFOF alone without checking its actual execution quality statistics.
  • Overlooking cash balance interest policies, which can matter significantly for large uninvested balances.
  • Not reading the terms for margin interest rates before enabling a margin account.

Conclusion

Commission-free brokerages are still businesses that need revenue — understanding where that revenue comes from helps you evaluate a brokerage on transparency and disclosure rather than the absence of a visible per-trade fee alone.